More on Keyword Optimisation

by Jon on October 31, 2010

Before I crack on once more with the AIDA model thing, I think it’s worth clearing up a few things that have been obviously bugging people about keywords (I say this because they have been bugging me about them).

Let’s take my own profession as an example, and look at it from the perspective of someone who’s looking for more clients and things online marketing would be A Good Idea (it’s not a bad one, but shouldn’t be your only one).

What’s more, don’t make the mistake of saying “Oh, it’s OK for you, but I’m not a copywriter”. The principles hold true for every niche or profession I can think of. I suppose it’s possible there are some where I doesn’t apply, but I’ll be buggered if I can imagine what they might be.

So. There you are: a brand new copywriter with the bubble-wrap just off your keyboard and the ink still wet on your AWAI certificate.

What do you do?

Most don’t even bother doing any keywords research at all and instead set up an Adwords account and write some half-arsed ads with “obvious” but ultimately nonsensical keywords like:

copywriting

copywriting uk

copywriting ireland

freelance copywriting

copywriting services

What’s wrong with these?

Well a several things, actually. Here are just two:

  1. They are very generic. You are really looking for people who are in the frame of mind to be buying, or at least open o information about buying whatever it is they’re looking for. Someone looking for “copywriting” might be a buyer, but they could also be just looking for information about the subject because they, too, want to do some copywriting.
  2. They are likely to be very competitive. Will you ever rank on page 1 of Google for “copywriting”. Perhaps. But, as you’ll see in a moment, you might not even care whether you do or not.

After a while, umpty thousands of pounds sunk into Adwords and SEO and reading Jon’s blog posts, we realise we need to be optimising for something a little less generic. So we put our Thinking Heads on and come up with something a little more specific to the niches we’d like to work in:

web copywriting

seo content writing

web content writer

direct mail copywriting

marketing copywriting

seo content writing

email copywriting

search engine optimization copywriting

search engine optimisation copywriting

search engine copywriting

Tangentially to point #1 above (this is quite subtle and almost all SEO “experts” miss this), they are looking for things whereas if you’re a copywriter looking for clients, you want people looking for people.

So, immediately, we could improve this with:

copywriter

copywriter uk

copywriter ireland

freelance copywriter

freelance copywriter uk

uk direct response freelance copywriter

web copywriter

seo content writer

web content writer

direct mail copywriter

marketing copywriter

seo content writer

email copywriter

search engine optimization copywriter

search engine optimisation copywriter

search engine copywriter

But even those are perhaps too generic.

And even if they’re not, we can still do a lot better:

copywriter wanted

freelance copywriter wanted

freelance copywriter needed

Hire a freelance copywriter

freelance copywriter London

freelance copywriter website

hire a freelance copywriter

direct mail copywriter wanted

marketing copywriter wanted

seo content writer wanted

search engine optimization copywriter wanted

search engine optimisation copywriter wanted

email copywriter wanted

search engine copywriter wanted

Now, can you see the difference?

It’s highly likely the people searching for these terms (which are genuine ones from Google, by the way) are looking for people to do this stuff for them.

In other words, most people typing in seo content writer wanted are indeed likely to be looking for someone to write seo content for them (some will perhaps be SEO content writers looking for people placing ads for SEO content writers, but in the main you’ll find they’re buyers looking for warm bodies able to write).

Now, a common objection I can almost hear being screamed at me is the search volumes are low.

Yes indeed. And you could argue if you’re dealing with natural searches it doesn’t matter how many “wasted” leads you get because email is free and you can email as easily to a million as you can to just one.

This is true.

However, you’re missing a couple of points here.

First, these principles are equally as applicable to Adwords as they are to natural search. If you focus your keywords tightly you’ll get more focused ads, cheaper click-throughs, less competition, better conversions and hence a much better ROI.

And secondly you’re going to find it much easier to find a dinky domain name and aim your content at your readers.

I hate to use this phrase because it takes me back to my days in big-business when I worked alongside a gazillion other anonymous middle-management zombies in the City, but this really is a case of working smarter, not harder.

If you've enjoyed this article, get email updates and help yourself to a heap of free marketing resources (it's all free). Just leave your details below, click the button... and I'll take care of the rest:


theWebalyst November 4, 2010 at 9:28 am

Hi Jon, or Baldy if you prefer (I’m not so far off joining the clan),
 
Thanks for your thoughts. I think it is clear that the best SEO is about smart, creative thinking, and your article illustrates this and makes a lot of other good basic points.
I don’t really buy your final set of keywords for on-site SEO (and am not sure I guite get the point about adwords) because even if we’re looking at higher conversions it certainly does matter if the traffic is very low. We can be wasting effort if either figure is poor so whatever approach we choose there is one vital element to add to this: monitoring and analysis. I guarantee that this (boring) stuff is the thing that most SEO’s and even more of their client businesses do too little of. Testing and review is vital – and its such a shame when the web makes it way way easier to do than it has ever been before. What do you think of this point?
Another thing I’d like to hear your thoughts on (and I will subscribe now to your newsletter) is how to do more creative SEO. A case study or two would be great.
Thanks for your thoughts,
Mark (in London)

Jon November 4, 2010 at 9:54 am

Mark, whether it was wasted effort or not would depend on the ROI. If you get highly qualified traffic converting to £20,000 projects, do you care if the volume is a tad low?

Mark Andrews IMCopywriting November 8, 2010 at 5:27 am

Another Mark joining in with some comments, this time from west Cornwall.
I think what Jon is saying, is sometimes it’s better to go for a much longer, long tailed keyword than it is to go for such non-specific keywords which you haven’t got such a good chance of ranking well for, in the search engines.
It depends how far you are prepared to go, to put a specific offer in front of your ideal target audience and buyers.
If this means going for keyword strings which on the face of it do not attract very much traffic but turn into paying customers almost immediately, especially in this copywriting business – well, this tactic and SEO strategy obviously makes a great deal more sense.
If you target a non-specific long tail keyword, sure it might get plenty of searches but is this your ideal audience? Are these people your ideal target market?
Best regards,
 
Mark Andrews – IMCopywriting.com (Internet Marketing Copywriting)
 

Previous post:

Next post: